15 shares Comments Troy Coyle Troy Coyle Today we have a ruling that Japanese whaling company Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd (Kyodo) is in contempt of Court and has been fined $1 million dollars. 17 November at 18:56 Emmanuel Chanel Emmanuel Chanel So what? We don't catch whales in Australian waters but in open ocean. Just you, Australia cause that some area is your territory. Don't you know Antarctic Treaty? The world's countries including USA don't admit your cause because of that. Don't you know the treaty without degrees of law? In Japan, it cannot be an excuse of your ignorance since everyone knows the treaty. 2 · 18 November at 04:50 Troy Coyle Troy Coyle Emmanuel, clearly it is Japan who is not aware of International Law as it is continuously found in breach or contempt. Also, just for your information, I did study International Law of the Sea at University. Did you? 18 November at 12:06 Yamamoto San Yamamoto San "International Law" - what international law is that? could you please quote me the law that says whaling is illegal. "I did study International Law" - then I guess you must be very familiar with UNCLOS. Since you studied law, brush yourself up with the IWC charter as well, know full well about the legalities of the commercial whaling moratorium. Sea Shepherd refused to pay their fines to the Faroese court (and they broke the law in Faroe's territory), so do you think Japan will be any different? Australian courts do not have jurisdiction over Japan or any Japanese entity, given the fact that Japan hunts in international waters. 4 · 18 November at 13:54 Troy Coyle Troy Coyle I love the irony. 18 November at 14:40 Yamamoto San Yamamoto San We are all the same Troy Cole smile emoticon 1 · 18 November at 15:21 Emmanuel Chanel Emmanuel Chanel Troy Coyle: LoL! So name the Australian sea area where we catch whales first! You just referred your court rule that have no meaning except you, Australia just cause the territorial rights on Antarctica. Do you think it proves this? >Emmanuel, clearly it is Japan who is not aware of International Law as it is continuously found in breach or contempt. The answer is NEVER. ICJ rule doesn't say that, neither. How can we expect you to plot our hunting points in Australian waters? Clear thing is that you just expose the racial prejudice against Japan without any factual evidences. >Also, just for your information, I did study International Law of the Sea at University. Did you? Do you mean that Australians don't learn Antarc Treaty or UNCLOS without learning them in the university and that you don't know Antarctic Treaty or UNCLOS even with studying International Law of the Sea in the university? Gee! I've advised you not to say that you have a doctor degree before since being Sea Shepherd with doctor degrees itself is damage impartiality on doctors. You add another case, heh. If you wanna cause that we violated the international law on the court rule issue, why couldn't you refute us instead of telling that reply? Especially, UNCLOS is what even very poor people learn in Japanese public middle schools. And as I've said, everyone Japanese knows Antarctic Treaty without degrees of laws. You show your ignorance with asking me by "Did you?". What a poor Dr Phil! This discussion is rather like one with a kid than like one with a Dr Phil. 2 · 18 November at 15:32 · Edited Troy Coyle Troy Coyle Little bit riled up Emmanuel? 18 November at 15:33 Emmanuel Chanel Emmanuel Chanel Oh, Troy Coyle blocks me. LoL 3 · 18 November at 16:31 Yamamoto San Yamamoto San Another Sea Shepherd coward bites the dust smile emoticon 3 · 19 November at 04:06